Container ship at sea
Marine and offshore

Ferry fuel: from too dirty to measure to ISO 16/14/11

The fuel from the operator's bunker barge was so contaminated that the laboratory could not measure it. After a sample was filtered, the independent analysis showed ISO 16/14/11, well within both the standard and the engine manufacturer's requirements. On the particle counter, the cleanliness code fell from ISO 24/23/22 to 14/13/12 in 25 minutes.

ISO 4406, fuel as delivered to the bunker barge (requirement: 18/16/13)

20/18/1216/14/11 after filtration
25 minutesfrom ISO 24/23/22 to 14/13/12 on the particle counter
7,274 to 434particles above 4 µm per ml, delivered fuel before and filtered sample after
CustomerFerry operator (not named by the manufacturer)
Countrynot stated
SystemBunker barge supplying the operator's ferries, 20-litre sample filtered with a DX-1001-T-PT and inline particle counter
FluidFuel oil

A ferry operator had its fuel examined at two stages: as delivered by the fuel supplier to the operator’s bunker barge, and as delivered on from the barge to the ferries.

The delivered fuel already failed: ISO 20/18/12 with 7,274 particles above 4 µm per ml, where the engine manufacturer’s requirement for engines with common rail and unit injectors is ISO 18/16/13 and no more than 2,500. The fuel from the bunker barge’s own tank was worse still. The independent laboratory could not measure it: the sample was too contaminated to give a meaningful particle count, because the barge’s tank added its own contamination on top.

A 20-litre drum of fuel from the barge’s tank was sent to the manufacturer and filtered with a DX-1001-T-PT fitted with an inline particle counter. The counter went from ISO 24/23/22 at the start to 15/14/13 after 15 minutes and 14/13/12 after 25 minutes, and the micropatch samples changed from dark grey to white. The independent laboratory analysis of the filtered fuel showed ISO 16/14/11 with 434 particles above 4 µm per ml, well within both the minimum standard and the engine manufacturer’s requirements.

The test was carried out on a sample at the manufacturer’s facility, not as an installation on board. It documents two things: that fuel can already be outside the requirements on delivery and then be further contaminated by the tank it is stored in, and that filtration can bring it back within the requirements.

The figures before and after

MeasurementBeforeAfter
ISO 4406, fuel as delivered to the bunker barge (requirement: 18/16/13)20/18/1216/14/11 after filtration
Particles above 4 µm per ml (requirement: max. 2,500)7,274434
Particles above 6 µm per ml (requirement: max. 640)1,349127
Particles above 14 µm per ml (requirement: max. 80)3812
Fuel from the bunker barge's own tanktoo contaminated to measureISO 16/14/11

Read the full case study

The rest of the case study, with every before and after measurement, opens once you have entered your work email and company. You only need to do this once; then every case study on the site is open.

We only use the details to see which companies are reading. You will not receive newsletters, and we will not call you.